"No good thing has been or
can be enjoyed by us without having first cost labour. And inasmuch as most
good things are produced by labour, it follows that all such things of right
belong to those whose labour has produced them. But it has so happened, in all
ages of the world, that some have laboured, and others have without labour
enjoyed a large proportion of the fruits. This is wrong and should not
continue. To secure to each labourer the whole product of his labour, or as
nearly as possible, is a worthy object of any good government."
Abraham Lincoln, 1847
'Labor' in the collective sense encompasses all the wage-earning
and some of the salaried components of the modern economy. It is historically
as much a political as an economic term because people in these sectors came to
realize common goals and predicaments as the Industrial Revolution reshaped
society.
In the nineteenth century the United States of America evolved
into 'the world's first corporation nation.' 1 At birth it was an
agrarian society with republican ideals but constitutional privileges favoring
male property owners who exclusively enjoyed the right to vote and paid
disproportionately low taxes. 2 Over the ensuing decades industrialization
and urbanization helped generate movements toward universal suffrage; public
education; the abolition of imprisonment for debt; and the ending of service in
the militia at one's own expense. The philosophical strand of the labor
movement drew its fire from progressive conceptions of a just and equitable
society relying on an independent, virtuous citizenry.
Trade unions, as they developed, tended to focus on the
immediate job interests of their members. The transformative changes of
industrial capitalism, especially during and after the Civil War-mechanization,
centralization, masses of cheap immigrant workers-were accompanied by painful
economic cycles and sometimes glaring disparities between returns to capital
and labor. Mutual aid societies were not enough. Unions began to seek more
ambitious improvements and rewards in the work environment.
One of the first in the stone industry was the Granite
Cutter's National Union formed on Clark's Island Maine in 1877. 3 An
early priority was the abolition of the truck system of trading at stores owned
and operated by the companies for which the cutters worked. Then they turned
their attention to shortening the hours of labor.
Three years from that date at a "very spirited public
meeting" of the Cape Ann Workingmen's Union in Village Hall cheers erupted upon the
announcement that Lanesville's granite companies had accepted the men's
petition for reduction of the work day to 10 hours. A large delegation from the
Pigeon Hill and the Rockport Granite companies were encouraged to stay firm in
their stand-down from 12 hours. The previous morning when the quarrymen employed
by those firms had reported at seven instead of the usual six o'clock they
had been ordered to resume full hours or
quit. "The men gathered around the office and shops of the company, in
quiet but anxious groups, and in the course of the day they were as rapidly as
possible paid up and discharged. What the result of all this will be is an
anxious question to hundreds of families." 4
The strike did not include the
stone cutters, or hammerers, who already worked on the ten hour system, but was
confined to the quarrymen, blacksmiths, teamsters and other laborers required
to work eleven or more hours daily. Solidarity among the various occupations
and levels of skill marked a strengthening in labor's position within the
industry.
Meanwhile, down in Bay View, Cape Ann Granite Company owner
Jonas H. French replied that he would only consider the petition when and if
all the other companies adopted it. Col. French took offense to the work
stoppage as "a question of dictation, to which he could not yield." 4
While the Lanesville quarries continued to do a brisk
business, operations at Rockport's larger granite facilities dwindled
drastically. A year later the newspaper chided recalcitrant owners.
The companies that refused, have
struggled against the odds during the entire year. This year, when the first of
April came around, the demand was renewed, and the Pigeon Hill Company
assented, and at once enlarged its field of operations. But the old Rockport
Granite Co., Mr. John Stimson's, held out with a vigorous obstinacy worthy of
some better object. But its foot hold has gradually crumbled away; laborers
have week after week deserted it, till last Saturday there was only one man at
work on the entire establishment. That fact touched bottom. Indeed, it scraped
on the reef! Monday morning a new departure was inaugurated. Men were employed
freely on the ten-hour basis; new men have been engaged every day, and now
about fifty are at work. The number will be rapidly increased, to a hundred or
more. There is apparently good ground for hoping that this company, with the
others, is now entering upon a new era of prosperity. Mr. John Stimson [an
incorporator in 1864], it is understood, expressed some time since, to the
directors, a desire to resign the active duties of his office. Mr. Charles
Rogers, formerly assistant treasurer, now in Minnesota, having declined to
return to his old position, the duties will doubtless soon be entrusted to
hands that will execute them with vigor and success. 5
Charles S. Rogers did return from Minnesota to become
Treasurer and a director of the corporation. He guided the Rockport Granite
Company to eventual ascendancy in the Cape Ann quarrying industry through a
time of proliferation of unions.
A branch
of the Granite Cutters National Union was organized in 1890 at Lanesville's Grand
Templar's Hall. All the officers and committee members at this date bore Anglo-Saxon
names. 6
Two
years later a prolonged national strike disrupted the granite industry and
opened the door further to immigrant populations in the quarries. We will
explore these trends in the next essay.
Sources
1. See Notes from
Halibut Point of May 4, "The Granite Industry, Part 5 of 6 -
Government"
2. The historical distillation that follows comes from Philip
S. Foner, History of the Labor Movement
in the United States, volumes 1 and 2 (of 8), 1947.
3. Stone Magazine, Vol. V., No. V., October, 1892 as quoted in the
website Quarries and Beyond.
4. Cape Ann Advertiser April 2, 10, 16 of 1880.
5. Ibid, April 29, 1881.
6. Gloucester Daily Times, October 4, 1890.